Get Started

🤖 DATA SCIENCE INTERVIEWS

Mock interviews with accomplished ML engineers

Master machine learning algorithms, model debugging, feature engineering, and production ML systems with data scientists from top companies. Practice real interview questions with expert feedback.

₹20-55L

Salary Range

Python

Primary Language

4-6

Interview Rounds

10-12 weeks

Prep Timeline

Find ML Mentors →

3 CORE SKILL AREAS

What Companies Test in Data Science Interviews

Based on 600+ ML interviews at FAANG. These 3 areas cover every DS interview question.

ML Theory & Algorithms

Master model selection, algorithm fundamentals, and ML system design

Interview Weight: 35% of interviews

Algorithm selection (regression, classification, clustering)

Bias-variance tradeoff and regularization

Feature engineering and selection techniques

Model evaluation metrics (precision, recall, AUC-ROC)

Cross-validation and hyperparameter tuning

Practical ML & Debugging

Debug models, fix overfitting, and handle production ML issues

Interview Weight: 35% of interviews

Overfitting vs underfitting diagnosis and fixes

Data leakage detection and prevention

Model drift detection and retraining strategies

Debugging poor model performance systematically

A/B testing ML models in production

Coding: Python, Pandas, Algorithms

Write production-quality ML code and implement algorithms from scratch

Interview Weight: 30% of interviews

Pandas data manipulation (groupby, merge, pivot)

NumPy vectorization and performance optimization

Implementing ML algorithms (gradient descent, k-means)

Data structures and algorithms (sorting, searching, trees)

Writing clean, testable, maintainable ML code

ALGORITHM SELECTION GUIDE

Choose the Right ML Algorithm

Interviewers test if you can select appropriate algorithms. Here's your decision framework.

Problem Type: Predicting continuous values (prices, sales, temperature)

Linear Regression

Low

When to use: Linear relationships, interpretability needed

Random Forest Regressor

Medium

When to use: Non-linear relationships, feature importance

Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)

High

When to use: Best performance, willing to tune

Neural Networks

High

When to use: Complex patterns, large datasets

Problem Type: Binary classification (fraud detection, churn prediction)

Logistic Regression

Low

When to use: Simple baseline, interpretability required

Random Forest Classifier

Medium

When to use: Handles non-linearity, feature importance

XGBoost / LightGBM

High

When to use: Structured data, best performance

Neural Networks

High

When to use: Unstructured data (images, text)

Problem Type: Multi-class classification (image recognition, document categorization)

Naive Bayes

Low

When to use: Text classification, simple baseline

Random Forest

Medium

When to use: Structured data, interpretable

Neural Networks (CNN)

High

When to use: Images, complex patterns

Transformers

Very High

When to use: Text, state-of-the-art performance

MODEL DEBUGGING SCENARIOS

Real Production ML Problems

70% of ML interviews test debugging. Master these patterns to ace the practical round.

Model shows 98% accuracy in training, 65% in production

🔍 Diagnosis:

Classic overfitting - memorized training data

✅ Solutions:

→ Add regularization (L1/L2, dropout)

→ Collect more training data

→ Use simpler model architecture

→ Check for data leakage (future info in features)

→ Validate on holdout set from production distribution

Model performs well offline but fails A/B test in production

🔍 Diagnosis:

Online metrics don't match offline metrics or model drift

✅ Solutions:

→ Align offline metrics with business KPIs

→ Train on recent production data

→ Optimize model latency (quantization, pruning)

→ Add robust error handling for edge cases

→ Monitor model predictions in real-time

Feature importance shows unexpected results

🔍 Diagnosis:

Data leakage or multicollinearity

✅ Solutions:

→ Check timestamp logic carefully

→ Remove highly correlated features (VIF > 10)

→ Split data first, then preprocess

→ Use SHAP values for better feature interpretation

PYTHON ML CODE LIBRARY

Common ML Coding Patterns

These patterns appear in 80% of ML coding rounds. Master them for technical interviews.

Feature Engineering: Create time-based features

import pandas as pd # Extract temporal features from datetime df['hour'] = df['timestamp'].dt.hour df['day_of_week'] = df['timestamp'].dt.dayofweek df['is_weekend'] = df['day_of_week'].isin([5, 6]).astype(int) # Create rolling features df['rolling_7d_mean'] = df.groupby('user_id')['purchases']\ .transform(lambda x: x.rolling(7, min_periods=1).mean()) # Days since last event df['days_since_last_purchase'] = ( df.groupby('user_id')['timestamp'].diff().dt.days.fillna(999) )

💡 Why this matters:

Time-based features often have high predictive power. Extract hour, day, rolling aggregates, and recency.

Cohort Analysis: Calculate 7-day retention by signup cohort

import pandas as pd # Group users by signup week signups = df.groupby('user_id')['signup_date'].min().reset_index() signups['cohort'] = signups['signup_date'].dt.to_period('W') # Calculate retention events = df.merge(signups[['user_id', 'cohort', 'signup_date']], on='user_id') events['days_since_signup'] = (events['event_date'] - events['signup_date']).dt.days retention = events[events['days_since_signup'] == 7]\ .groupby('cohort')['user_id'].nunique() cohort_size = signups.groupby('cohort')['user_id'].nunique() retention_rate = (retention / cohort_size * 100).round(2)

💡 Why this matters:

Cohort analysis reveals user behavior patterns. Key for churn prediction and product analytics.

Handle Imbalanced Classification (fraud detection)

from sklearn.utils import resample from imblearn.over_sampling import SMOTE # Option 1: Undersample majority class majority = df[df['fraud'] == 0] minority = df[df['fraud'] == 1] majority_downsampled = resample( majority, n_samples=len(minority), random_state=42 ) balanced = pd.concat([majority_downsampled, minority]) # Option 2: SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Oversampling) smote = SMOTE(random_state=42) X_resampled, y_resampled = smote.fit_resample(X_train, y_train) # Option 3: Class weights in model from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier model = RandomForestClassifier(class_weight='balanced')

💡 Why this matters:

Imbalanced classes (1% fraud) require special handling. Use resampling, SMOTE, or class weights.

MODEL EVALUATION DEEP DIVE

Beyond Accuracy: Choose the Right Metric

Accuracy is often meaningless. Understand which metric matches your business problem.

Precision & Recall

Precision = TP/(TP+FP), Recall = TP/(TP+FN)

Use case: Imbalanced classification (fraud, disease detection)

Tradeoff: Precision ↑ = fewer false alarms. Recall ↑ = catch more positives. Can't optimize both.

F1-Score / F-Beta

F1 = 2 * (Precision * Recall)/(Precision + Recall)

Use case: When you need balance between precision and recall

Tradeoff: F2-score weights recall 2x more (use when false negatives costly)

AUC-ROC

Area under ROC curve (TPR vs FPR)

Use case: When you need threshold-independent evaluation

Tradeoff: Good for comparing models, but doesn't tell you optimal threshold

Mean Absolute Error (MAE)

MAE = (1/n) * Σ|y_true - y_pred|

Use case: Regression when you care about average error magnitude

Tradeoff: Treats all errors equally, doesn't penalize large errors more

12-WEEK PREP ROADMAP

Complete Data Science Interview Prep Plan

Structured timeline to master ML theory, debugging, coding, and system design.

Weeks 1-3

ML Fundamentals

Master core algorithms (regression, trees, ensemble methods)

Understand bias-variance tradeoff deeply

Learn feature engineering techniques

Practice explaining algorithms to non-technical audience

Study evaluation metrics for different problem types

Weeks 4-6

Practical ML & Debugging

Practice debugging overfitting and underfitting

Learn to detect and fix data leakage

Master cross-validation and hyperparameter tuning

Study production ML challenges (drift, latency)

Practice A/B testing ML models

Weeks 7-9

Coding & Implementation

Implement algorithms from scratch (gradient descent, k-means)

Master Pandas data manipulation

Practice LeetCode medium problems (150+ problems)

Write clean, vectorized NumPy code

Build portfolio of ML projects

Weeks 10-12

Case Studies & Systems

Practice end-to-end ML case studies (10+ cases)

Learn ML system design (recommendation, search, ranking)

Master behavioral STAR storytelling

Practice whiteboard model debugging

Mock interviews with feedback

ML TOOLS ECOSYSTEM

Technologies Data Scientists Must Know

Core stack for production ML. Focus depth on 2-3 tools per category.

Core Libraries

scikit-learn

XGBoost

LightGBM

CatBoost

TensorFlow

PyTorch

Data Processing

Pandas

NumPy

Polars

Dask

PySpark

Visualization

Matplotlib

Seaborn

Plotly

SHAP (explainability)

MLOps & Production

MLflow

Weights & Biases

Docker

Kubernetes

Airflow

Cloud Platforms

AWS SageMaker

GCP Vertex AI

Azure ML

Databricks

SUCCESS STORIES

From Practice to FAANG ML Offers

These data scientists mastered ML interviews with CrackJobs and landed dream roles.

Vikram P.

ML Engineer

"Google asked me to debug a model that was overfitting. I walked through my systematic approach: check training curves, look for data leakage, add regularization, validate on holdout set. Mentioned cross-validation and early stopping. They said my debugging process was 'exactly what we do here.'"

Ananya K.

Applied Scientist

"The case study was brutal: 'Build a churn prediction model.' I structured it like CrackJobs taught me—EDA, feature engineering, algorithm selection, evaluation metrics, production considerations. Explained precision-recall tradeoff for imbalanced data"

Rahul M.

Data Scientist

"Meta's coding round was intense—implement gradient descent from scratch in 30 minutes. Thanks to CrackJobs, I'd practiced this 20+ times. Wrote clean, vectorized code with NumPy, handled edge cases, explained the math. Cleared in 22 minutes."

AVOID THESE MISTAKES

5 ML Interview Mistakes That Fail Candidates

Based on 700+ ML interview evaluations. Fix these to dramatically improve your performance.

Mistake #1

Not starting with exploratory data analysis (EDA) before modeling

Why it fails:

Leads to wrong feature choices and missed data quality issues

✅ How to fix it:

Always start interviews with: 'Let me first explore the data—check distributions, missing values, correlations, outliers.' Shows you understand data before jumping to models. Mention specific checks: df.describe(), df.isnull().sum(), correlation matrix.

Mistake #2

Choosing algorithms without justifying the choice

Why it fails:

Shows lack of understanding of algorithm trade-offs

✅ How to fix it:

Always explain: 'I'd start with XGBoost because it handles non-linearity well, gives feature importance, and is robust to outliers. For comparison, I'd try Logistic Regression as a simple baseline to see if we need complexity.' Justify every choice.

Mistake #3

Not discussing model evaluation beyond accuracy

Why it fails:

Accuracy is often misleading, especially with imbalanced data

✅ How to fix it:

For fraud detection (1% fraud), 99% accuracy is useless if model predicts 'no fraud' always. Discuss: precision, recall, F1-score, AUC-ROC. Say: 'For this problem, I'd optimize for recall because missing fraud is costly. I'd use F2-score to weight recall 2x more than precision.'

Mistake #4

Implementing ML algorithms without explaining the math

Why it fails:

Interviewers want to see you understand what's under the hood

✅ How to fix it:

When coding gradient descent, say: 'We're minimizing loss by iterating: theta = theta - learning_rate * gradient. Learning rate controls step size—too high causes oscillation, too low is slow. I'll add momentum for faster convergence.' Math + code = strong signal.

Mistake #5

Not mentioning production considerations and monitoring

Why it fails:

Shows you've never deployed ML models to production

✅ How to fix it:

Always end with production concerns: 'In production, I'd monitor prediction distribution, feature drift, latency, and business metrics. Set up alerts for model performance degradation. Plan for retraining cadence—weekly for fast-changing data, monthly for stable data.'

DEEP DIVE GUIDES

Master Specific ML Topics

Common ML Interview Mistakes to Avoid

Learn the most common pitfalls in ML interviews—from algorithm selection to model debugging and production ML.

Read Complete Guide →

HOW IT WORKS

Practice ML Interviews in 3 Steps

Choose ML Focus

Select ML theory, model debugging, or Python coding. Browse data scientists from top companies.

Practice 55-Min Session

Work through real ML problems—algorithm selection, debugging overfitting, coding challenges. Get live feedback.

Get Expert Evaluation

Detailed feedback on ML theory, problem-solving approach, code quality, and communication.

Ready to Master ML Interviews?

Join 350+ data scientists who mastered ML algorithms, model debugging, and Python coding. Start practicing today.

Start ML Practice Today →

🤖 Real ML problems

🐛 Debug production models

💳 Pay per session